Tuesday, May 28 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast ↓ Breakfast is served daily between 7 and 9am in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
09:00 - 10:00 |
Christopher Leininger: Atoroidal surface bundles ↓ I will discuss joint work with Autumn Kent in which we construct the first known examples of compact atoroidal surface bundles over surfaces for which the base and fiber genus are both at least 2. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:30 |
Spencer Dowdall: Lattice Veech groups and geometric finiteness in mapping class groups ↓ Going beyond the setting of convex cocompactness, there is an effort to develop a theory of geometric finiteness for subgroups of mapping class groups that captures a broader range of behaviors and relates these to the structure of Teichmüller space, the action on the curve complex and the geometry of surface group extensions as viewed, for example, via hierarchical hyperbolicity. I will survey some progress in this direction and highlight various examples that fit into this picture. We will focus on the case of lattice Veech groups, which are perhaps the prototypical candidates for geometric finiteness. I will describe the geometric structure of these groups and how it gives rise to hierarchical hyperbolicity and quasi-isometric rigidity for the associated surface group extensions. Joint work with Matt Durham, Chris Leininger, and Alex Sisto. (TCPL 201) |
11:30 - 13:00 |
Lunch ↓ Lunch is served daily between 11:30am and 1:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:30 - 14:00 |
Stefanie Zbinden: Using strong contraction to obtain hyperbolicity ↓ For almost 10 years, it has been known that if a group contains a strongly contracting element, then it is acylindrically hyperbolic. Moreover, one can use the Projection Complex of Bestvina, Bromberg and Fujiwara to construct a hyperbolic space where said element acts WPD. For a long time, the following question remained unanswered: if Morse is equivalent to strongly contracting, does there exist a space where all generalized loxodromics act WPD? In this talk, I will introduce the contraction space, a space which answers this question positively. (TCPL 201) |
14:00 - 14:30 |
Eliot Bongiovanni: Extensions of Finitely Generated Veech Groups ↓ Given a closed surface S, a subgroup G of the mapping class group of S has an associated extension group Γ, which is the fundamental group of an S-bundle with monodromy an isomorphism to G. A general problem is to infer features of Γ from G. I take G to be a finitely generated Veech group and show that Gamma is hierarchically hyperbolic. This is a generalization of results from Dowdall, Durham, Leininger, and Sisto regarding lattice Veech groups. The focus of this talk is constructing a hyperbolic space ˆE on which Γ acts nicely (isometrically and cocompactly). This example contributes to the growing evidence of a good notion of “geometric finiteness” for subgroups of mapping class groups. (TCPL 201) |
14:30 - 15:00 |
Brian Udall: Parabolically geometrically finite subgroups of mapping class groups ↓ We will discuss the parabolically geometrically finite (PGF) subgroups of mapping class groups, which is a class of groups generalizing the definition of convex cocompact groups via the curve complex. This class contains all finitely generated Veech groups, as well as free products of multitwist groups on sufficiently far apart multicurves. We will discuss two results about these groups. First, they are undistorted as subgroups of the mapping class group. Second, we give a combination theorem which allows one to build many more examples of PGF groups. With whatever time is remaining afterwards, we will discuss open problems. (TCPL 201) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:30 - 16:30 |
Giorgio Mangioni: Combinatorial data from quasi-isometries, and quasi-isometric rigidity of (random quotients of) mapping class groups. ↓ A result of Behrstock, Hagen, and Sisto states that, under suitable conditions, a self-quasi-isometry of a hierarchically hyperbolic space induces an automorphism of the "hinge graph", which roughly encodes the intersection patterns of standard quasiflats of the maximum dimension. If one is able to identify who this graph is, and most importantly the group of its simplicial automorphisms, then one can aim at some classification of quasi-isometries.
In this talk we will first review the construction of the hinge graph and its automorphism. The machinery can then be applied to prove that random quotients of mapping class groups of surfaces are quasi-isometrically rigid, meaning that if such a quotient and a finitely generated group are quasi-isometric then they are weakly commensurable. The key point is that, in this case, the hinge graph is related to the corresponding quotient of the curve graph, whose automorphism group is the quotient group itself (this is the analogue of a result of Ivanov-Korkmaz for mapping class groups). If time permits, we will also show how quasi-isometric rigidity can be used to deduce other "rigidity" results, such as the fact that all automorphisms of such quotients are inner. (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:30 |
Group Discussion 2a: Geometric Finiteness (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:30 |
Group Discussion 2b: QI Rigidity (TCPL 202) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner ↓ A buffet dinner is served daily between 5:30pm and 7:30pm in Vistas Dining Room, top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |