09:30 - 10:30 |
Braxton Osting: Targeting Influence in a social network ↓ We introduce and analyze a model for targeting influence in a social network. Namely, the opinion of each member of the network lies in an opinion space, taken to be the convex hull of some extreme opinions. Member opinions are assumed to evolve via a nearest-neighbor Laplacian dynamical model and are affected by opinion authorities. We pose the question: how should opinion authorities be chosen to maximally target influence within the network? We establish that our general problem is NP-hard and that the objective function is a submodular function. Introducing a convex relaxation, we show that the problem can be approximately solved using fast methods. This is joint work with Zachary Boyd, Nicolas Fraiman, Jeremy Marzuola, and Peter Mucha. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
11:00 - 12:00 |
Vladas Pipiras: Multivariate (high-dimensional) time series modeling for multiple subjects ↓ The focus of this talk is on multivariate, possibly high-dimensional, time series modeling for multiple subjects. The time series could be large sparse vector autoregressions (VARs) or dynamic factor models sharing common structures across the subjects. The talk will cover parts of several recent papers of the speaker and co-authors, touching upon methodological and computational issues, several applications, and theoretical challenges. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
15:00 - 16:00 |
Sayan Banerjee: Centrality measures in dynamic random networks ↓ Centrality measures (CM) are vertex statistics which quantify the `popularity’ of a vertex in the network. These can be local statistics like degree, or they can non-local, like Google’s PageRank, where the popularity of a vertex depends on the network geometry beyond its one-step neighborhood. We investigate the role of CM in the evolution, asymptotics and reconstruction of dynamic random networks. In particular, we discuss a class of growing networks where the propensity of a vertex to attract new `friends’ depends on its current centrality score. This includes preferential attachment models (CM= degree) and random surfer models (CM=PageRank). We explore root and seed detection problems, the distribution of centrality scores of the network vertices, and compare the efficacy of different centrality measures in quantifying popularity. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
16:30 - 17:30 |
Zach Boyd: Correlation networks: Interdisciplinary approaches beyond thresholding ↓ Many empirical networks originate from correlational data, arising in domains as diverse as psychology, neuroscience, genomics, microbiology, finance, and climate science. Specialized algorithms and theory have been developed in different application domains for working with such networks, as well as in statistics, network science, and computer science, often with limited communication between practitioners in different fields. This leaves significant room for cross-pollination across disciplines. A central challenge is that it is not always clear how to best transform correlation matrix data into networks for the application at hand, and probably the most widespread method, i.e., thresholding on the correlation value to create either unweighted or weighted networks, suffers from multiple problems. In this article, we review various methods of constructing and analyzing correlation networks, ranging from thresholding and its improvements to weighted networks, regularization, dynamic correlation networks, threshold-free approaches, and more. Finally, we propose and discuss a variety of key open questions currently confronting this field. (Conference Room San Felipe) |