Monday, August 16 |
08:15 - 08:30 |
Introduction and Welcome by BIRS Staff ↓ A brief introduction to BIRS with important logistical information, technology instruction, and opportunity for participants to ask questions. (Online) |
08:30 - 09:15 |
Alex Lubotzky: Stability and testability of permutations' equations ↓ Let A and B be two permutations in Sym(n) which "almost commute"- are they a small deformation of permutations that truly commute? More generally, if R is a system of wards-equations in variables X=x1,…,xd and
A1,…,Ad permutations which are nearly solution; are they near true solutions? It turns out that the answer to this question depends only on the group presented by the generators X and relations R. This leads to the notions of
"stable groups" and "testable groups". We will present a few results and methods which were developed in recent years to check whether a group is stable\testable. We will also describe the connection of this subject with property testing in computer science, with the long-standing problem of whether every group is sofic and with IRS's ( =invariant random subgroups). (Online) |
09:30 - 10:10 |
Mariapia Moscatiello: Bases of permutation groups and IBIS groups ↓ Let G be a permutation group acting on a finite set Ω. A subset B of Ω is called a base for G if the pointwise stabilizer of B in G is trivial.
In the 19th century, bounding the order of a finite primitive permutation group G was a problem that attracted a lot of attention.
Early investigations of bases then arose because such a problem reduces to that of bounding the minimal size of a base of G.
Some other far-reaching applications across Pure Mathematics led the study of the base size to be a crucial area of current research in permutation groups. In this part of the talk, we will investigate some of these applications and review some results about base size. We will present a recent improvement of a famous estimation due to Liebeck that estimates the base size of a primitive permutation group in terms of its degree.
In the second part of the talk, we will define the concept of irredundant bases of G and the concept of IBIS groups. Whereas bases of minimal size have been well studied, irredundant bases and IBIS groups have not yet received a similar degree of attention. Indeed, Cameron and Fon-Der-Flaas, already in 1995, defined such groups and proposed to classify some meaningful families. But only this year, a systematic investigation of primitive permutation IBIS groups has been started. We will discuss how we reduced the classification of primitive IBIS groups to the almost simple groups and affine groups. Eventually, we will conclude by mentioning recent advances towards a complete classification. (Online) |
10:30 - 11:15 |
Martin Liebeck: Cherlin's conjecture on binary groups ↓ A permutation group G on a set X is called binary if the following condition holds: if r>2 and
x,y∈Xr are 2-equivalent r-tuples, then x and y must be in the same G-orbit. Here we say x=(x1,…,xr) and y=(y1,⋯,yr) are 2-equivalent if any pair (xi,xj) can be mapped to the corresponding pair (yi,yj) by an element of G. The definition was coined by Gregory Cherlin as part of his theory of homogeneous structures in model theory. Over 20 years ago, Cherlin conjectured that the all the finite primitive binary groups fall into three families: the full symmetric groups Sym(X); cyclic groups of prime order; and a certain class of affine groups of dimension 1 or 2. In joint work with Nick Gill and Pablo Spiga, we have completed the proof of this conjecture.
In the talk I will try to explain the point of the binary definition in relation to model theory, discuss various examples of binary groups, and indicate some of the strategies of the proof of the conjecture. (Online) |
11:30 - 12:15 |
Gareth Tracey: On the Fitting height and insoluble length of a finite group ↓ A classical result of Baer states that an element x of a finite group G is contained in
the Fitting subgroup F(G) of G if and only if x is a left Engel element of G. That is, x∈F(G)
if and only if there exists a positive integer k such that [g,kx]:=[g,x,...,x] (with x appearing
k times, and using the convention [x1,x2,x3...,xk]:=[[...[[x1,x2],x3],...],xk]) is trivial for
all g∈G. The result was generalised by E. Khukhro and P. Shumyatsky in a 2013 paper via
an analysis of the sets
EG,k(x):={[g,kx]:g∈G}.
In this talk, we will continue to study the properties of these sets, concluding with the proof
of two conjectures made in said paper. As a by-product of our methods, we also prove a
generalisation of a result of Flavell, which itself generalises Wielandt’s Zipper Lemma and
provides a characterisation of subgroups contained in a unique maximal subgroup. We also
derive a number of consequences of our theorems, including some applications to the set of odd
order elements of a finite group inverted by an involutory automorphism.
We will finish the talk with some related work on the question: Which finite groups G can
have an element contained in a unique maximal subgroup of G? All of this is joint work with
R. M. Guralnick. (Online) |
13:00 - 13:45 |
Colin Reid: In search of well-foundedness principles for totally disconnected locally compact groups ↓ For some classes of groups, there is a natural notion of rank, which can be used to argue by induction or sometimes even classify the groups: for example, the order of a finite group, or the dimension of a Lie group. Closely related is the pervasive theme of decomposing a group into "basic" or "irreducible" factors. How far can we get with this approach in the class of totally disconnected locally compact second-countable (t.d.l.c.s.c.) groups?
I will describe a certain approach to structural complexity of t.d.l.c.s.c. groups that is inspired by developments in the area over the last ten years, particularly the class of elementary groups introduced P. Wesolek in his 2014 PhD thesis. The latter work shows that one can get a surprising amount of information from descending chain conditions on subgroups, and associated ordinal-valued rank functions, from a perspective that takes all compact groups and discrete groups as having small rank. I will give an example of a class of "well-founded" groups with good closure properties that properly contains the elementary groups, including for example all locally linear groups and many examples of compactly generated simple groups acting on trees with Tits' independence property, but then also give a family of t.d.l.c.s.c. groups that do not belong to this class. (Online) |
14:00 - 14:20 |
Group Photo ↓ Please turn on your cameras for the "group photo" -- a screenshot in Zoom's Gallery view. (Online) |
14:30 - 15:15 |
Simon Smith: A local-to-global complement to Bass--Serre Theory ↓ Groups acting on trees play a fundamental role in the theory of groups.
Bass--Serre Theory, and in particular the notion of a graph of groups,
is a powerful tool for decomposing groups acting on trees. It is also useful for constructing discrete groups acting on trees. However, its usefulness for constructing non-discrete groups acting on trees is, in some situations, severely limited. Such groups play an important role the theory of locally compact groups, as they are a rich source of examples of compactly generated simple groups.
An alternative, but complementary, approach to the study of groups acting on trees has recently emerged based on local actions. Its origins can be traced back to the work of J.~Tits, but it was in a seminal paper of M.~Burger and Sh.~Mozes that this ``local-to-global'' approach was first fully articulated. Typically, these local-to-global constructions have something called Tits' independence property (P). Intuitively this property means that a group can act independently on different branches of the tree.
In joint work with Colin Reid, we have developed a general method for describing and classifying all actions of groups on trees with property (P). This is done using an object called a local action diagram, akin to a graph of groups, but for local actions. Our work can be seen as a `local action' complement to Bass-Serre theory. As an example of how effective this local action diagram approach is, for a group G with property (P) one can easily determine if G is simple directly from its local action diagram. (Online) |
19:00 - 19:45 |
John Bamberg: Orbits of Sylow p-subgroups of finite permutation groups ↓ We say that a finite group G acting on a set X has Property (*)_p for a prime p if the stabiliser of x in P is a Sylow p-subgroup of the stabiliser of x in G, for all x in X and Sylow p-subgroups P of G. Property (*)_p arose in the recent work of Tornier (2018) on local Sylow p-subgroups of Burger-Mozes groups, and he determined the values of p for which the alternating and symmetric groups in their natural actions have Property (*)_p. In this talk, we will explore the various properties of groups satisfying (*)_p and extensions of Tornier's result (Online) |
20:00 - 20:45 |
Michael Giudici: 2-closed groups and automorphism groups of digraphs ↓ Wielandt introduced the notion of the 2-closure of a permutation group G on a set Ω. This is the largest subgroup of Sym(Ω) with the same set of orbits on ordered pairs as G. We say that G is 2-closed if G is equal to its 2-closure. The automorphism group of a graph or digraph is a 2-closed group. In this talk I will discuss some recent work with Luke Morgan and Jin-Xin Zhou on 2-closed groups that are not the automorphism group of a graph or digraph. (Online) |