08:00 - 08:50 |
Andreas Rupp: Variations of enriched Galerkin methods for the linear advection equation ↓ We interpret the enriched Galerkin (EG) method as generalization of standard finite elements (contin- uous Galerkin, CG) and of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method by combining the continuous and the discontinuous trial spaces of CG and DG, and by using the DG bilinear and linear forms.
Then, we introduce algebraic flux correction schemes for the standard enriched (P1⊕P0 and Q1⊕P0) Galerkin discretizations of the linear advection equation. Here, the piecewise-constant component stabilizes the continuous Galerkin approximation without introducing free parameters. However, violations of discrete maximum principles are possible in the neighborhood of discontinuities and steep fronts. To keep the cell averages and the degrees of freedom of the continuous P1/Q1 component in the admissible range, we limit the fluxes and element contributions, the complete removal of which would correspond to first-order upwinding.
Finally, we discuss a further generalization of the enriched Galerkin method. The key feature of this step is an adaptive two-mesh approach that, in addition to the standard enrichment of a conforming finite element discretization via discontinuous degrees of freedom, allows to subdivide selected (e.g. troubled) mesh cells in a non-conforming fashion and to use further discontinuous enrichment on this finer submesh. Here, we prove stability and sharp a priori error estimates for a linear advection equation under appropriate assumptions. (Online) |
08:50 - 09:40 |
Remi Abgrall: On the notion of conservation for hyperbolic problem ↓ Since the celebrated Lax Wendroff convergence theorem, published in 1960 in CPAM, every one knows what should be the structure of a finite volume/finite difference scheme so that one can have a reasonable hope of convergence towards the ‘true’ entropy solution. The proof can easily be adapted to schemes like the discontinuous Galerkin ones, thought it becomes a bit less clear. There are however many schemes that does not fit clearly in that framework: continuous finite element methods, for example. Though it is relatively easy to prove a variant of the Lax Wendroff for them, this does not answer the question of the engineer: show me explicitely the flux. There are other questions related to conservation. We all know that it is forbiden by the Law to discretize the non conservative version of a conservative system (for example, the Euler equations in primitive variables), and there are many counter examples. However, to which extend is that statement true? If one has an additional conservation law satisfied by the system (for example entropy conservation for smooth solutions, or kinetic momentum preservation), how can we modify a given ‘good’ scheme so that the modified one will satisfy all constraints?
In this talk, which sumarizes [1,2,3,4,5,6], I will try to show the boundaries of these statements, and provide example of schemes, some already known, some more recent, that contradict, in some sense, the standard beliefs. But not too much.
References
1. R. Abgrall. Some remarks about conservation for residual distribution schemes. Computational Meth-
ods in Applied Mathematics, 18(3):327–350, 2018.
2. R. Abgrall and S. Tokareva. Staggered grid residual distribution scheme for Lagrangian hydrodynamics.
SIAM J. Scientific Computing, 39(5):A2317–A2344, 2017.
3. R. Abgrall. A general framework to construct schemes satisfying additional conservation relations,
application to entropy conservative and entropy dissipative schemes. J. Comput. Phys, 372(1), 2020.
4. Nathaniel Morgan Rémi Abgrall, Konstantin Lipnikov and Svetlana Tokareva. Multidimensional Stag-
gered Grid Residual Distribution Scheme for Lagrangian Hydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.,
42(1):A343–A370, 2020.
5. R. Abgrall. A combination of Residual Distribution and the Active Flux formulations or a new class
of schemes that can combine several writings of the same hyperbolic problem: application to the 1D
Euler equations, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12572
6. R. Abgrall, P. Öffner, and H. Ranocha. Reinterpretation and Extension of Entropy Correction Terms
for Resi (Online) |
10:10 - 11:00 |
Hennes Hajduk: Property-preserving discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving hyperbolic conservation laws ↓ Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods are among the most widely used numerical discretization tech- niques for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Their local conservation property, inherent stability, and, favorable scalability in parallel make these schemes attractive for many applications. There are how- ever, many shock-dominated examples, for which even DG methods fail to produce stable approximations. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed an algebraic flux limiter, which blends a provably property- preserving low order method with a corresponding high order DG target scheme. This monolithic convex limiter is primarily ]used to impose local (and global) bounds on numerical approximations, but extensions for incorporating entropy inequalities, as well as relaxation of the constraints in smooth regions are also possible. In my talk, I will discuss the details of the approach, which include the sparsification of the low order method, stabilization of the numerical flux, as well as the design of the monolithic limiter. Sequential limiting for products of unknowns and the preservation of global constraints, such as nonnegativity of pres- sure will also be touched upon and similarities to comparable schemes will be put into context. All presented numerical results were obtained with a code that is based on the open source C++ library MFEM. The performance of the method will be evaluated by considering a variety of classical benchmarks for scalar conservation laws, as well as the systems of shallow water and Euler equations. (Online) |
11:00 - 11:50 |
Yekaterina Epshteyn: Numerical Methods for Shallow Water Models ↓ In this talk, we will discuss design of structure-preserving central-upwind finite volume methods for shallow water models in domains with irregular geometry and for shallow water models with uncertainty. Shallow water models are widely used in many scientific and engineering applications related to modeling of water flows in rivers, lakes and coastal areas. Shallow water equations are examples of hyperbolic systems of balance laws and such mathematical models can present a significant challenge for the construction of accurate and efficient numerical algorithms.
We will show that the developed structure-preserving central-upwind schemes for shallow water equations deliver high-resolution, can handle complicated geometry, and satisfy necessary stability conditions. We will illustrate the performance of the designed methods on a number of challenging numerical tests. Current and future research will be discussed as well. (Online) |
13:20 - 14:10 |
Arturo Vargas: GPU Accelerated ALE Remap Strategies ↓ In this talk we present our work in updating the high-order finite element-based ALE remap method in the MARBL multi-physics code from LLNL [1] for high performance on GPU platforms. MARBL is a multi- material hydrodynamics code based on a three phase Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) framework: evolution of physical conservation laws within a moving material (Lagrangian) frame; mesh optimization, and field remap. The remap step corresponds to the transfer of state variables from the initial mesh to the optimized mesh and can often dominate the run time for typical calculations. For high fidelity simulations it is imperative that the remap procedure be accurate, preserve physical quantities, and be monotonic (not introduce new extrema). Furthermore, for scalable performance in large scale calculations it is imperative that the characteristics of the algorithm are well suited for modern computing platforms (e.g. GPU based architectures).
This work is based on adopting a matrix-free algorithmic approach. The current remap algorithm in MARBL is based on the work of Anderson and co-authors [1, 2] which introduce a high-order approach based on concepts from flux corrected transport (FCT) and a discontinuous Galerkin (dG) discretization for the advection equation but requires full matrix assembly due to its algebraic nature. Methods based on full matrix assembly are known to have poor performance as the order of the method is increased. In addition, there are involved memory motion operations which do not work well on GPU architectures. The new matrix-free framework we have been developing combines the residual distribution schemes of Hajduk and co-authors [3,4] with a high-order DG scheme using the clip scale strategy of Anderson et al. in [5]. Lastly, we describe the algorithmic tailoring for the GPU and present performance comparisons between the different frameworks.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. LLNL-ABS-824642. (Online) |