Monday, April 1 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast ↓ Breakfast is served daily between 7 and 9am in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
08:45 - 09:00 |
Introduction and Welcome by BIRS Staff ↓ A brief introduction to BIRS with important logistical information, technology instruction, and opportunity for participants to ask questions. (TCPL 201) |
09:00 - 10:00 |
Michael Stessin: Determinantal hypersurfaces, joint spectra, and representations of groups, I ↓ This talk is based on joint works with Z. Cuckovic, T. Peebles, A. Tchernev and J. Weyman.
Given a tuple A1,...,An of N × N matrices, determinantal hypersurface σ(A_1, ..., A_n) is an algebraic set in the complex projective space CP^{n−1} given by σ(A_1, ..., A_n) = \{[x_1, ..., x_n] \in CP^{n−1} : det(x_1A_1 + ...x_nA_n) = 0\}. In the infinite dimensional case of operators acting on a Hilbert space, the corresponding set is called the projective joint spectrum and is defined by σ(A_1, ..., A_n) =\{[x_1, ..., x_n] \in CP^{n−1}: x_1A_1 + ... + x_nA_n \textrm{ is not invertible}\}. The main topic of the talk is how the geometry of the joint spectrum reveals a mutual behavior of the operators in the tuple. We’ll see that this investigation leads to a characterization of representations of finite Coxeter groups in terms of determinantal hypersurfaces.
This is the first part of a two talk presentation. The second one will be given by A. Tchernev. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:30 |
Alex Tchernev: Determinantal Hypersurfaces, Joint Spectra, and Representations of Groups II ↓This is the second in a series of two talks. Part I was presented by M. Stessin.
The connection between the geometry of joint spectra and representations of Coxeter groups that was discussed in Part I raises a framework of fundamental structural questions, special cases of which go all the way back to the origins of representation theory. I will formulate these, and describe how joint works with Z. Cuckovic,
T. Peebles, R. Schiffler, M. Stessin, and J. Weyman fit into this framework. (TCPL 201) |
11:30 - 13:00 |
Lunch ↓ Lunch is served daily between 11:30am and 1:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:00 - 14:00 |
Guided Tour of The Banff Centre ↓ Meet in the Corbett Hall Lounge for a guided tour of The Banff Centre campus. (Corbett Hall Lounge (CH 2110)) |
14:00 - 14:20 |
Group Photo ↓ Meet in foyer of TCPL to participate in the BIRS group photo. The photograph will be taken outdoors, so dress appropriately for the weather. Please don't be late, or you might not be in the official group photo! (TCPL 201) |
14:30 - 15:00 |
Kenneth R. Davidson: Non-commutative Choquet Theory ↓ The nc state space of an operator system A is the nc convex set of u.c.p. maps into Hilbert spaces.
The operator system is identified with the nc affine functions on the state space.
The space of nc continuous functions on the state space is the maximal C*-algebra generated by A,
and the space of bounded nc functions corresponds to the double dual.
Measures on C(K) are replaced by u.c.p maps, and they represent the restriction to A.
We identify the states of A with unique representing maps, and show that the nc extreme points correspond to the boundary representations.
The convex envelope of a continuous nc function is a multivalued nc function.
This function has an equivalent form in terms of u.c.p. maps.
This leads to two natural orders on u.c.p. maps, the nc Choquet order and the dilation order, which turn out to coincide.
There is a noncommutative Choquet-Bishop-de Leeuw theorem that every state of A has a representation as a u.c.p. map on the C*-algebra which is in a certain sense supported on the extreme boundary.
This is joint work with Matthew Kennedy. (TCPL 201) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:30 - 16:30 |
Frauke Bleher: Cup products and Frobenius operators ↓ In this talk I will begin with a review of the Frobenius operator \Phi on the \ell-adic cohomology of a curve C over a finite field of characteristic p different from \ell. The spectrum of \Phi determines the zeta function of C, and is a basic invariant of C. I will show how, under certain hypotheses, a derivative of \Phi can be used to compute certain natural cup products in the cohomology of C. It is an open problem with applications in cryptography to determine the computational complexity of finding such cup products. This is joint work with Ted Chinburg. (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:30 |
Rongwei Yang: Projective Spectrum, Group Theory and Complex Dynamics ↓ Finitely generated structures are important subjects of study in various mathematical disciplines. Examples include finitely generated groups, finitely generated Lie algebras and C^*-algebras, tuples of several linear operators on Banach spaces, etc. It is thus a fundamental question whether there exists a universal mechanism in the study of these vastly different entities. In 2009, the notion of projective spectrum for several elements A_1, A_2, ..., A_n in a unital Banach algebra {\mathcal B} was defined through the multiparameter pencil A(z)=A_1+z_2A_2+\cdots +z_nA_n, where the coefficients z_j are complex numbers. This conspicuously simple definition turned out to have a surprisingly rich content. In this talk we will review some results related to group theory, complex geometry, Lie algebras, operator theory and complex dynamics. (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner ↓ A buffet dinner is served daily between 5:30pm and 7:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |