Monday, June 13 |
07:30 - 08:45 |
Breakfast (Restaurant at your assigned hotel) |
08:45 - 09:00 |
Introduction and Welcome (Conference Room San Felipe) |
09:00 - 09:40 |
Valentin Ovsienko: Projective geometry old and new. From 1956 to 2016 ↓ The ideas of projective geometry have a certain « universality » and appear in many different fields of mathematics and physics. As mathematics itself, the destiny of this old area is to remain forever young… The goal of this talk is to illustrate this universality on contemporary examples; our main characters are the Schwarzian derivative, S, and the pentagram map, T. I will explain what this S and T have in common. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
09:50 - 10:30 |
Richard Montgomery: Linear billiard systems, the positive-energy N-body problem and Lagrangian relations ↓ Recall Rutherford scattering. A 2-body problem was solved with the key ingredient being scattering: incoming and outgoing lines which were asymptotes to associated hyperbolae. In the N-body problem at positive energies, when a certain limit is taken, families of solutions converge to a system of N incoming and N outgoing rays with a finite number of elastic collisions in between. We abstract this situation to a ``point billiard process'' whose data consist of a Euclidean vector space E endowed with a finite collection of codimension d linear subspaces called ``collision subspaces''. The solutions to the `process'' are unit speed continuous piecewise linear trajectories corresponding to
billiards played on the table E minus the union of the collision subspaces.
These solutions, or ``billiard trajectories'' move in straight lines away from the collision subspaces. Upon hitting a subspace the reflect off according to the standard law of reflection. The ``dynamics'' associated to the process is not deterministic since for a given ray incoming to a collision subspace
there is a d−1 dimensional sphere's worth of allowable outgoing rays. The ``itinerary'' of such a trajectory is the list of subspaces it hits, in the order hit. Two basic questions are: (A) Are itineraries finite? (B) What is the structure of the space of all trajectories having a fixed itinerary?
In two beautiful papers from 1998 Burago-Ferleger-Kononenko [BFK] use non-smooth metric geometry ideas (CAT(0) and Hadamard spaces) to answer (A) affirmatively.
We answer (B): this space of trajectories is a Lagrangian relation on the space of oriented lines in E. Our proof relies on two techniques, (1) generating families for Lagrangian relations, and (2) the metric geometry introduced by BFK and relying crucially on a theorem of Reshetynak. We will focus on (2). This is joint work with Andreas Knauf and Jacques Fejoz. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
10:30 - 11:00 |
Coffee Break (Conference Room San Felipe) |
11:00 - 11:40 |
Gil Bor: Bicycle mathematics in 3D ↓ The geometry of planar bicycles paths has been shown, by work of Sergei Tabachnikov and his collaborators, to be a beautiful and rich subject. I will show, mainly via computer-generated animations, a natural extension of some of the results to 3-dimensional bike paths. This is work in collaboration with Mark Levi, Ron Perline and Sergei Tabachnikov. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
11:50 - 12:30 |
Richard Schwartz: The Plaid model, outer billiards, and Truchet tilings ↓ I'll explain a combinatorial model, which I call the plaid model. For each rational parameter, the construction produces a finite union of embedded polyhedral surfaces in a cube. When the surfaces are sliced in one direction, the
resulting curves encode the dynamics of outer billiards on kites. When the surfaces are sliced in other directions, they give the same families of curves (up to isotopy) as those produced by Pat Hooper's Truchet tile system. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
12:40 - 13:20 |
Ken Stephenson: Shape Convergence in Conformal Tiling ↓ (Joint work with Phil Bowers, Florida State) The famous
"Penrose" tiling is perhaps the most well known hierarchical,
aperiodic tiling of the plane. We consider this and other infinite
tilings generated by subdivision rules. However, we put conformal
structure rather than euclidean structure on the tiles, giving
so-called "conformal tilings". Conformal tiling is determined by
combinatorics alone, and is not limited by the rigid geometric
constraints of classical tilings, thus it brings up new issues in
tiling theory. This talk will rely heavily on tiling images.
Among other things, those images suggest that aggregates of
conformal tiles may converge in shape to their classical euclidean
counterparts. This raises an interesting issue: how can rigid euclidean
shapes be encoded in abstract combinatorics? This is a new side of
tiling theory with many open questions. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
13:20 - 13:30 |
Group Photo (Hotel Hacienda Los Laureles) |
13:30 - 15:00 |
Lunch (Restaurant Hotel Hacienda Los Laureles) |
15:15 - 15:55 |
Mark Levi: Coriolis—like forces in inertial frames and Gaussian curvature ↓ I will describe counterintuitive behavior of particles in rotating potentials, as well as some related effects such as the curious Coriolis-like force acting on binaries in an ambient gravitational field. I will also mention the unexpected role of the Gaussian curvature in this connection. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
16:00 - 16:30 |
Coffee Break (Conference Room San Felipe) |
16:30 - 17:10 |
J. M. Landsberg: What can geometry tell us about theoretical computer science? ↓ Complexity theory deals with determining when there
does or does not exist a faster algorithm than the standard for some basic task such as multiplying matrices. In the case of matrix multiplication, Strassen shocked the world in 1969 by finding an algorithm faster than the standard one and computer scientists now
make the astonishing conjecture that as the size of the matrices increase, it becomes almost
as easy to multiply two nxn matrices as it is to add them. The famous
P v. NP problem essentially conjectures that there is no fast solution
to the traveling salesperson problem. Recently algebraic geometry and
representation theory have led to advances regarding these conjectures.
I will give an overview of these questions and the recent advances. (Conference Room San Felipe) |
19:00 - 21:00 |
Dinner (Restaurant Hotel Hacienda Los Laureles) |